measuredI/O

What decision did your last report change?

Most reputation measurement describes what happened. It should decide what happens next. I build the second kind, on the data you already license, with a method published in full so you can check every number.

The method

One question, asked three ways, from discovery to decision.

Measurement fails in a predictable place. Teams skip straight to counting, so the report describes beautifully and changes nothing. These three run in order, and each one has to be in place before the next can work.

The rule: fix the earliest link that is failing. Adding coverage when the break is further down the chain is the most common and most expensive mistake in communications measurement.
Try it

Ranked by reach, the wrong stories win.

Reach as supplied by media tools is usually a publisher constant, the same number attached to every article from that outlet. Switch the ranking and watch what rises.

Proof

Don't take my word for it. The method is public.

OPEN · FREE · NO GATE

The Reputation Index

100 Fortune 1000 companies across six sectors, scored monthly on open data. Every figure traces to the article behind it and the query is published.

Open the index ↗

THE BOOK

Reputation Intelligence

The model, the discovery method and the translation layer, published in full. Foreword by John Box, CEO of Meltwater.

About the book  ·  Buy it ↗

FREE · 15 QUESTIONS

Measurement maturity assessment

Score your team's measurement framework out of 100, see your level against the field, and get the three answers costing you the most points. Built with the Data-Driven Communications practice at Meltwater.

Take the assessment ↗

BUILT IN THE FIELD

Twenty years of this

The Communications Intelligence Center of Excellence at Western Union, 30+ markets with a crisis command center. Before that, Cisco's Market Insights Engine.

About Evan

What proof looks like

A proof chain: signal, brief, decision, outcome.

The report is not the product. The decision it changed is. Every SIGNAL brief is built to leave a chain like this one behind it, so the value of the work can be shown, not just claimed.

Week 1 · Signal detected

Trust is sliding

75 → 68, falling 3.5 points a week. The pattern matches coverage that has preceded analyst downgrades.

Week 2 · Brief delivered

The CFO is briefed

One SIGNAL brief: what changed, why it matters to the CFO's outcomes, the gap to peers, and a named action with an owner and a cost.

Weeks 3–4 · Decision

A program is funded

A governance transparency program is approved and launched against the driver that was failing.

Weeks 8–12 · Outcome

The slide stops

Trust stabilizes by week 8. No downgrade follows. The chain is documented, and the value is stated in the terms the CFO used to approve it.

Illustrative example from Chapter 6 of Reputation Intelligence, not a client result. Client proof chains are shared in a conversation, with the client's permission. See the figure  ·  Build your own

Three ways to use this

Learn it, build it with me, or have it delivered.

Learning it is free. Building it and having it delivered both start with a PBI scoping session, because both need to know which coverage counts.

FREE · NO GATE

Learn it

The book publishes the whole method and its nine tools are free in your browser. The index demonstrates it every month on 100 companies, on open data.

The toolkit  ·  The index ↗

90 DAYS

Build it with me

Assess, scope, build, hand off. Twelve weeks that end with your team running the loop themselves: the scoring discipline, the review gate, and the translation into decisions.

The 90-Day Build

DELIVERED

Have it delivered

The Brief, monthly or weekly, on your existing licensed coverage. Scored, verified against the PBI scope, and ending in a decision with an owner.

See a live brief

“Every CCO I know has struggled with the same question: how do I prove that what we’re doing actually moves the needle on reputation and ultimately valuation? Evan’s book finally answers that.”
Nicole Vogrin Chief Communications Officer, Waterdrop (formerly Western Union) On Reputation Intelligence

Start where it is cheapest to start.

The index is free and always will be. The Brief is what a team gets when the index is not enough, because the index cannot see the coverage behind your license.

Questions

What does measuredI/O do?
measuredI/O measures media reputation for communications leaders and turns the result into a decision. Three frameworks run in order: Persona-Based Insights to establish who the reporting serves and what they decide, the Media Reputation Score to score the coverage against those priorities, and SIGNAL to translate the score into action with an owner and a cost.
What is a Media Reputation Score?
A composite score out of 100 for how earned media coverage is shaping a company's reputation. Every article scores on four pillars: Sentiment at 35%, Distinction at 25%, Authority at 25% and Amplification at 15%. A company's score is the mean of its article scores, so the volume of coverage cannot raise it.
Is the method public?
Yes. The model is published in Reputation Intelligence and demonstrated every month on 100 Fortune 1000 companies at mrsindex.com, on open data, with no gate and no form. Every figure there traces to the article behind it.
Do I need to buy or switch software?
No. Client work runs on the media data you already license. There is no platform to adopt, no seat licenses and nothing to migrate. It is platform-neutral by design, whichever media intelligence platform you use.
Who is behind measuredI/O?
Evan Escobedo, founder and managing partner. He built the Communications Intelligence Center of Excellence at Western Union across more than 30 markets, built Cisco's Market Insights Engine, and wrote Reputation Intelligence: A Communications Leader's Guide from Data Provider to Strategic Advisor, with a foreword by John Box, CEO of Meltwater.
Does this measure what AI assistants say about us?
Not directly, and it does not pretend to. Scoring what an AI assistant says about a company is a different measurement from scoring coverage, and it is not part of MRS today. What MRS does measure is the earned coverage those answers are largely built from, judged the way answer engines tend to judge it: by the authority of the source and by whether the company is the subject of the story. A company losing on Authority and Distinction in its coverage is building its AI visibility on a weak base.